“Plugins do work in CC, but they not in the way they work in Photoshop and Classic,” he says. This mentality is also why Lightroom CC lacks the ability to work with plugins in the same way that they do in Classic. That’s not to say we won’t add more things to CC to shorten that gap, but we look strategically at what people need, what photographers are telling us, and where the industry is headed.” “With Lightroom CC, we haven’t built those into the product because the needs of what people are using are different than when Classic was built. Because of the timeframe Classic was developed, there wasn’t Facebook and social media so these are a kind of carryover from that time,” Mangalick explains. “So you’re going to have a print, slideshow module, and FTP to a website. These perspectives directly relate to the small differences between the two. Because it works across platforms, the assumption is that those files won’t necessarily be on the device currently in use, and leans more into cloud storage as a result. On Classic, the platform assumes that photographers are going to have access to the photos they want to edit on a local machine and doesn’t lean on cloud storage to do so. That base assumption is the core of what makes Classic and CC different. “With Lightroom Classic, the assumption was that everything that would be edited was on a photographer’s computer.” “ were built to solve different needs,” he tells PetaPixel. Left: Lightroom CC, Right: Lightroom Classic He tells PetaPixel that the goal has always been to build and innovate both products together. For Adobe and the Lightroom team, from an editing perspective, the two programs have reached feature parity.Īdobe never planned to retire Lightroom Classic, despite what some feared, Mangalick says. The only editing-based difference between Classic and CC is that CC does not have the Camera Calibration panel, but most of what an editor can do there can be done elsewhere in the editing stack. So why are there two programs, and what’s the plan for the future? What is the Difference Between Lightroom Classic and Lightroom CC? Today, the editing suite is nearly identical across both applications - as far as what a photographer can do to edit a photo, there is no appreciable difference. What few photographers probably have realized is that in addition to speeding up classic and giving it new capabilities, Adobe has also managed to bring CC up to feature parity with Classic. The challenge now is a number of years later, people only remember the original rollout only remember that it was underpowered back then, not what it is now.” We purposely made the product less feature-heavy so we could understand what people actually need,” he says. “When we rolled our Lightroom CC, photographers would have been right: it didn’t do as much as Classic did. At the same time, Adobe’s Lightroom teams have made both CC and Classic more robust and added multiple new features.Īccording to Sharad Mangalick, Adobe’s Photo Product Manager (which includes Adobe Camera Raw, Lightroom, and Lightroom Mobile), CC launched in such a bare-bones manner on purpose. There was a time that the Lightroom brand was synonymous with slow, but in 2022 it is a complaint that is rarely raised. Classic, which for years was maligned for being slow and only getting slower, managed to turn that perspective around. Over the course of the next five years, it would co-develop the two platforms side by side.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |